<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Malware? We don&#8217;t need them!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.search-optimization.com/blog/google/malware-we-do-not-need-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.search-optimization.com/blog/google/malware-we-do-not-need-them/</link>
	<description>Search marketing beyond the search engines &#124; Search Optimization Marketing (SOM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 02:09:11 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Varghese</title>
		<link>http://www.search-optimization.com/blog/google/malware-we-do-not-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-32987</link>
		<dc:creator>Varghese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 12:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-optimization.com/blog/?p=171#comment-32987</guid>
		<description>PC running fast and efficiently. 
I have searched for and tired many different types of scanners to keep my PC running fast and efficiently. Many of them are similar when it comes to picking up the same types of viruses but there is a big difference when it comes to price. Search-and-destroyAntispyware is one of the best that Iâ€™ve used so far and itâ€™s even cheaper than some of the better known scans like Norton and similar scanners. I found the antispyware solution from Search-and-destroyto be the answer to keeping my PC like new and you can check it out for yourself at Search-and-destroy/antispyware.html.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PC running fast and efficiently.<br />
I have searched for and tired many different types of scanners to keep my PC running fast and efficiently. Many of them are similar when it comes to picking up the same types of viruses but there is a big difference when it comes to price. Search-and-destroyAntispyware is one of the best that Iâ€™ve used so far and itâ€™s even cheaper than some of the better known scans like Norton and similar scanners. I found the antispyware solution from Search-and-destroyto be the answer to keeping my PC like new and you can check it out for yourself at Search-and-destroy/antispyware.html.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malware?Wedon&#39;tneedthem! &#187; SOM Report</title>
		<link>http://www.search-optimization.com/blog/google/malware-we-do-not-need-them/comment-page-1/#comment-32667</link>
		<dc:creator>Malware?Wedon&#39;tneedthem! &#187; SOM Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 05:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-optimization.com/blog/?p=171#comment-32667</guid>
		<description>[...] According to the Official Google Online Security Blog, Google has given reasons behind the visibility of certain lines like &#8220;This site may harm your computer&#8221; while doing Google Search for any content. More&#8230;.&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to the Official Google Online Security Blog, Google has given reasons behind the visibility of certain lines like &ldquo;This site may harm your computer&rdquo; while doing Google Search for any content. More&#8230;.&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

