<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bot 2.0 Replacing MSNBot 1.1 For Better Crawling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.search-optimization.com/blog/industry-news/bot-20-replacing-msnbot-11-crawling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.search-optimization.com/blog/industry-news/bot-20-replacing-msnbot-11-crawling/</link>
	<description>Search marketing beyond the search engines &#124; Search Optimization Marketing (SOM)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:31:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bot2.0ReplacingMSNBot1.1ForBetterCrawling &#187; SOM Report</title>
		<link>http://www.search-optimization.com/blog/industry-news/bot-20-replacing-msnbot-11-crawling/comment-page-1/#comment-45636</link>
		<dc:creator>Bot2.0ReplacingMSNBot1.1ForBetterCrawling &#187; SOM Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 14:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.search-optimization.com/blog/?p=373#comment-45636</guid>
		<description>[...] Microsoft will be saying good-bye to MSNBot1.1 that will be replaced by the next bot: 2.0B. In the Bing Community Blog, the team has said that there are many improvements made in the Bot 2.0 on the basis of performance and other areas. All the changes are done after the concerns showed by the webmasters.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Microsoft will be saying good-bye to MSNBot1.1 that will be replaced by the next bot: 2.0B. In the Bing Community Blog, the team has said that there are many improvements made in the Bot 2.0 on the basis of performance and other areas. All the changes are done after the concerns showed by the webmasters.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
